The
Monroe Doctrine, the American policy that has kept foreign powers from
pursuing military gains in our Western Hemisphere for two centuries, is
apparently no longer in vogue in Washington.
Pursuing
three main goals, the Beijing government has dived deeply into Latin America
and the Caribbean. Economically, China seeks access to raw materials
throughout the region. Diplomatically, it seeks to persuade nations to
cut ties with Taiwan. And finally, and perhaps most worrisome, it seeks
to gain dependable military outposts right on America’s borders.
China has
become a major factor in Latin American affairs. After President Hu Jintao’s
first visit to Latin America in 2004, it took just three years for bilateral
trade to reach over $100 billion, notes policy expert Russell Hsiao. 121
bilateral agreements and cooperation initiatives have been signed since 2000,
concentrating in trade, cultural, public administration/consular affairs,
science and technology, tourism, and military matters.
Along
with billions in cash, thousands of Chinese workers have poured into the
region, training troops, manning strategic facilities, and deeply interacting
with inter-American organizations. Beijing joined the Organization
of American States as a permanent observer. It also joined the Inter-American
Development Bank with a donation of $350 million.
It expanded diplomatic ties with the Group of Rio, the Andean Community, and
the Caribbean Community groups.
China
clearly seeks to replace American influence in the region. Its government
recently sent a very celebratory congratulatory message to Venezuela’s Hugo
Chavez and Chilean President Sebastian Pinera last December on the founding of
the “Community of Latin American and Caribbean States” (CELAC), a grouping that
includes every nation in the western hemisphere except the United States and
Canada.
China’s
recently released official policy statement on Latin America clearly adopts a
policy of ever-deepening military relations with our neighbors to the south.
Any
rational analysis of China’s investments leads to the conclusion that military,
as well as economic, goals are the top priority. As Dr. Evan Ellis notes
in Chinese Engagement with Nations of the Caribbean, Beijing has
developed port facilities on both the east and west sides of the Panama Canal,
and a massive deepwater port and airport facility in Freeport, The Bahamas,
just 65 miles from the USA, as well as a deep sea port in Suriname.
To enhance its
military’s familiarization with the region, China has sent a naval hospital
ship to Cuba and peacekeeping forces to Haiti. Ellis notes that “The PRC also
conducts significant interactions with the militaries of virtually all of the
Caribbean nations with which it has diplomatic relations. A series of
senior level Caribbean military leaders have visited China in the past two
years…At a lower level, people-to-people military interactions have included
inviting uniformed Caribbean military personnel and defense civilians for
professional education trips to the PRC…The PLA donated $3.5 million in
non-lethal military equipment to the Jamaica defense Force in 2010….The PLA is
also reported to have personnel at Soviet-era intelligence collection
facilities in Bejucal, Lourdes, and Santiago de Cuba…”
The
U.S.-China Economic & Security Review Commission reports that Venezuela,
Chile, Bolivia and Cuba now maintain strong ties to the Chinese military
“through a high number of official visits, military officer exchanges, port
calls, and limited arms sales.” Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador have begun
to buy Chinese arms and military equipment, including radar and aircraft.
Bolivia has signed a military cooperation agreement with China.
A
Jamestown Foundation study of China’s arms sale to the region notes highlights
China’s goal of allowing Latin American and Caribbean nations to distance
themselves from Washington, The report notes indicates that “Beijing’s
military to military ties are growing with the states of South America across
the board: military missions, educational exchanges and arms sales.
This activity is part of Beijing’s overall advancement of a foreign policy.”
For centuries,
presidents, whether Republicans or Democrats, liberals or conservatives, have
reacted forcefully and quickly to foreign military inroads to this
region. President Kennedy’s forceful response in the Cuban Missile Crisis
and President Reagan’s moves to oust the Soviets from Central America are the
most recent examples. The White House needs to inform Americans why it
has abandoned this successful policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment